½ñÈÕÈÈÃÅʼþ

A speech by Greg Tanzer, Commissioner, ½ñÈÕÈÈÃÅʼþ to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security: Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2014, 29 January 2015.

Ìý

In opening our evidence, there are four points I would like to make:

• Firstly, under the current law ½ñÈÕÈÈÃÅʼþcan access telecommunications data and, via warrant, stored communications in order to investigate white collar crime. ½ñÈÕÈÈÃÅʼþhas responsibly exercised these powers for many years. This type of evidence is vital for ASIC’s investigation of white collar crime, such as insider trading, just as it is for the types of investigations conducted by the criminal law enforcement agencies given access to this information under the Bill. The Bill, on its face, proposes to take away ASIC’s powers when, to our knowledge, there is no suggestion that ½ñÈÕÈÈÃÅʼþhas misused or abused these powers or does not need them.
• Second, the white collar crimes ½ñÈÕÈÈÃÅʼþpursues pose significant threats to Australia’s economic security and Australians’ financial wellbeing. Australia’s growing superannuation pool, now standing at $1.87 trillion, has been targeted by criminal elements in the past, and the physical harm and mental anguish suffered by victims of fraud and white collar crime is vast and ongoing, as demonstrated by the collapse of the Trio superannuation funds. ½ñÈÕÈÈÃÅʼþhas important criminal law enforcement functions which it can only perform if it has the right tools. ½ñÈÕÈÈÃÅʼþhas grave concerns the Bill in its current form could compromise ASIC’s investigation powers, and increase the threat to Australians of financial crime.
• Third, as outlined in our submission, ½ñÈÕÈÈÃÅʼþis subject to significant safeguards and oversight to protect the privacy of any telecommunications data it obtains.
• Finally, if the Bill is passed in its current form, it is possible that the Minister may make a declaration allowing ½ñÈÕÈÈÃÅʼþto access telecommunications data or apply for stored communications warrants under certain conditions. ½ñÈÕÈÈÃÅʼþconsiders this a sub-optimal outcome, as it would create risks and uncertainty into the future.

In light of the importance of access to this data to the investigation of white collar crime, and in light of the safeguards and oversight in place to protect the privacy of the information, ½ñÈÕÈÈÃÅʼþsubmits that the Committee consider recommending that ½ñÈÕÈÈÃÅʼþis included in the definition of agencies entitled to access to this data within the Bill.